Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

Contrary to what clear thinking people believe, FreeThoughtBlogs is not named inappropriately. Because you see, “free thought”, when it comes to FreeThoughtBlogs means letting the thoughts in your brain fly around with gay abandon, freeing them from logic and common sense, continuously mixing them with the irrational fuel of feelings and emotions until they reach an escape velocity sufficient to overcome all the pulls of reason and are hurled out into the the FreeThoughtBlogs zoo where hundreds of eager “freethinkers” trapped in cages with invisible walls anxiously await more food for generating outrage.

While most of FreeThoughtBlogs is quite mediocre, to truly find the the stuff that would crash a reason-o-meter, you have to visit the very appropriately named LousyCanuck. Here is his latest post :

Dawkins stabs at Skepchick over “Hug Me I’m Vaccinated” campaign

Now for some “free” thinking from there.

 The hyper-privileged folks nearest the top of our movement have pretty uniformly fallen on one side of this divide — the side that would rather not skeptically examine ideas like social conventions, consent, harassment policies and protecting the underprivileged.

How on earth do you examine “skeptically” the “idea of social conventions”? Let’s take an example – a social convention is to hold the door open if someone is right behind you. So now let’s be skeptical about it and let’s think freely. This leads us to a fascinating array of possibilities like:

1) What if I don’t hold the door open?

2) What if I slam the door into the person’s face?

3) What if it’s a feminist and she kicks me for being patriarchal?

4) Wait, is this the correct door, or is it a fire exit?

.

.

And so you can see how the power of truly “thinking freely” can give you a lot more things to be skeptical about. Now this wouldn’t be so bad if you could also use such “free thinking” against them. But express skepticism that elevators are not that dangerous and you will find that you are not actually allowed to think that. Because? BECAUSE THEY SAID SO!

You cannot “skeptically” examine social etiquette, personal styles, and their interpretations because these are subjective matters. The FTB bloggers like to throw around words like reason, skepticism, rational, free-thought much like the way politicians throw around words like pride, greatest, Jesus, god, honour etc. And they have just as much credibility.

They are also not averse to lying or as I like to call it “thinking freely about facts”.

So it’s absolutely no surprise to me that Dawkins has, again, sided against Skepchick — this time, instead of writing a “Dear Muslima” comment at Rebecca Watson (telling her that the sexism she encounters isn’t nearly as bad as female genital mutilation, so she should grow up or get a thicker skin)

Except that he didn’t say that it wasn’t nearly as bad. He said it was ZERO bad.

But my point is that the ‘slightly bad thing’ suffered by Rebecca was not even slightly bad, it was zero bad.

Another frequent hobby of the FTB bloggers is to pretend they are great warriors for social justice, bravely weathering the harsh comments of Internet posters who criticize them, courageously typing out blog posts attacking those who do not see the world through the one lens of social justice to cover them all, steadfast in their resolution to let no opportunity for generating outrage go by. You would find it a hard task indeed to find this level of arrogance even at the Fox News Network.

It is so far beneath Dawkins that it serves only to undercut his image as a rationalist in my eyes — not that I was any longer under any delusion that he is a pure rationalist.

Alert the presses! Richard Dawkins has gone down as a rationalist in the estimation of a blogger on the Internet who makes universally quantified statements like

It is an emotive argument about the morality of expecting consent before actions are taken involving other people,

If you are about to be hit by a car, expect this guy to ask for your consent to push you out of the way. Because that would be the moral thing to do. Or if a bug is about to walk on to your dinner plate or down your shirt, expect this guy to ask for your consent to flick it off – because hey, who knows? Some people might prefer eating bugs and would rather have it moving around inside them rather than be finger-flickeded.

Of course, it’s not all bad. You will find some real gems of free-thought which you would most likely would not have thought of, such as:

Offering hugs as a reward for vaccination is a nice idea

Now lest you think that is not that mind-blowing, he adds a caveat:

but at the same time, it’s well within the rights of the person who gets a vaccine to forgo the hug.

These are truly words of wisdom that the Internet cannot do without. The rights of women to wear burqas in France? The rights of people to draw cartoons of Mo? Meh! But wait, there’s more!

And in fact, some people are even bothered by the very offer of a hug, so those people must needs make that apparent before they partake in the free vaccination services offered, because the whole event is predicated on something that might be to them a trigger, if not a simple preference.

Sometimes the writing gets freed from the grammar as well. But even after trying various combinations of grammatical fixes, I’m not quite sure what he means. Maybe it means that organizers should make it clear that the vaccines can be had without the hugs. Because “free thinkers” might think that you cannot get a vaccine without a hug!

There is a whole lot more of “hugs etiquette” that I will not bother going through. I will save my energy for what will probably be the next blog post on FTB – A Formalized Skeptical, Rational, Social Justice based Social Etiquette policy that takes into account everyone’s objective level of privilege , feelings, and emotions.

In closing, I think the most apt word for most of the FTB bloggers is, I think, “infantile”. You know how some parents tell kids that there are hungry people in the world so you should not waste your food and you should eat your spinach because it’s good for you? FTB bloggers were the kids who said “Just because other people are dying of hunger does not mean I should eat spinach even if it makes me stronger. I DON’T LIKE IT! I WANT ICE-CREAM ONLY AND NOTHING ELSE. WAH! WAH! WAH!”

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

I’ve always been proud of the fact that I developed a rational, atheistic, naturalistic worldview by the time I was 16 even though I did not know a single atheist and even though I had not read anything related to skepticism or atheism. I just have a very good fraud detector.

While technically, guilt by association is not something you need to defend against, I do wish to distance myself as much as I can from the religious groupthink that is FreeThoughtBlogs (FTB). To state it with as much restraint as I can muster, not all of us atheists/skeptics/freethinkers are petty, nasty, juvenile, immature, arrogant, narcissistic people.

Through the conflation of muddy subjective feelings / political points of view with the clarity of objective reality, they have dumped so much dirt in the clear waters of free thought, that it has flowed all the way upstream and too close to the rest of who were still exploring the beautiful clear waters which hide so many things wondrous, beautiful, and new.

In a way it was inevitable when too many non-scientifically trained minds got a platform to blather about their feelings, emotions, and political agendas, free from criticism in an area which relies very heavily on clear, logical, and scientific thought.

Their attitude wouldn’t be so disgusting, so repulsive, so loathsome, if they were at least honest enough to admit that they don’t give a damn about real issues of social justice. Stereotyping is bad, but I can’t help but say that these are your typical bunch of over-privileged (Haha. See what I did there?), morally bankrupt westerners who pat themselves on the back for saving the world everyday by commenting on the Internet, driving a Prius, flying around the country (Presumably to save electricity by not using the Internet) giving speeches at conferences and sending $20 to Africa once a year while voting for a black man to show how non-racist they are, who by the way, is no different from the previous white guy when it comes to dropping bombs and killing and torturing innocent people around the world. If FTB is your sample space then the hypothesis of “morality as only a status display” is well and truly a solid theory.

I hope these people do not come to represent skepticism/atheism. If they do, I will have to stop calling myself an atheist and start saying I am an agnostic.

See these for examples of above mentioned behaviour:

Bullying

Stupid Drama

Censorship

Subjective Reality

Attention seeking

Pompous Prickery

Uncivilized Barbaric Behaviour

and too many more to list.

Read Full Post »

Yes, this is a bit late to be writing on this topic. However, this incident happened before I had this blog. And the monumental stupidity of this whole thing keeps lingering in my mind as everyday on my way to work, I pass Dunkin Donuts, henceforth known as DD. What happened was that DD came up with this ad of some woman named Rachel Ray endorsing it. The picture in the ad was the one below. Now if you hadn’t heard of this incident, what would you find objectionable about this?

Only a crazy fucking idiot would have a problem with this. Did I say crazy fucking idiot? Her name is Michelle Malkin and you can find her psycho-babble on this ad over here. Let me also add obnoxious, retarded cretin to that. This mental case thinks that this scarf represents “the traditional scarf of Arab men that has come to symbolize murderous Palestinian jihad”.

Now there will always be lunatics in this world. And a lot of them will thrive in a world where a retarded chimpanzee like Bush can become president. What is frutrating is that DD actually pulled their ad in response to this. Ironically, this crazy retard says of them “They have braved boycott threats and attacks over their lonely, principled stance against illegal immigration.

I used to get coffee, donuts, and hash browns regularly at DD. Now I don’t. If you are sick of such pandering to the ravings of mad lunatics, you should also boycott them. Write about it if you can.

Funnily enough, the only other people who would have a problem with this ad would be the crazy Islamic terrorists because her face and arms are not covered! Right wing nutjobs like Malkin and Islamic terrorists have one thing in common: Brain Damage.

Read Full Post »

Hummers are the ugliest vehicles you can find on the road. And they are slow as hell. How insecure must you be to buy this monstrosity that was once advertised with the tag-line “Restore your manhood”? Surely, no-one is that small?

I wondered what kind of people own hummers. So I popped over to one of the hummer forums and here is what I found. With apologies to my spell-checker…

Faster than a snail

Faster than a snail


(more…)

Read Full Post »

I recently came across this on the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund

Hi,

Have you ever heard of aerial hunting? It’s a brutal practice. Wolves are shot from low-flying aircraft or chased to exhaustion, then killed at point-blank range.

Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican nominee for Vice President, promotes this barbaric practice, exploiting a loophole in the Federal Airborne Hunting Act to allow private wolf killers to shoot down wolves using aircraft. We have to get the word out about this!

Well, I have something to say about that!

Fuck those wildlife protection pussies! They have no respect for the noble sport of hunting. They are just jealous of us hunters because they lack the courage we possess as we bravely face a savage deer with murderous antlers with just an AK47. What other sport requires the eagle-eye to aim the cross-hair of our precision scope rifles on these beasts, the speed to chase down the fowl that haven’t been clipped, the roughness to brave the wilderness and elements of nature as we battle through them in our Hummers. What other sport requires the survival instincts needed to ration the beer so that it lasts the entire day,  the quick wits needed to outsmart these cunning and intelligent creatures, and the skill required to pull the trigger without shooting our huge dicks that grow to 20 inches every time we go hunting.

So yeah, fuck these animal protection pussies. They do not understand how evolution works. It is the survival of the best and every bullet that kills a wild beast is testimony to the superiority of us superior homo sapiens over the rest of the animal kingdom. If it weren’t for the pure lack of empathy and a sense of pride and joy in killing present in us brave hunters, who would fight our wars? We would soon devolve into the chicken species. Other species would evolve over us. Bears would start to bear arms. Our dogs would start walking us.

So yeah, go home, pet your gun, and shoot the dog.

PS: When making love to your gun, do it unprotected, condoms and safety catches are an invention of the devil.

Read Full Post »